Complaint No 1:
1. That with due respect to You, the Hon'ble Judges, it would not be wrong to say that as per the scheme of the Constitution of India, the judiciary was given the power and duty to check and undo whenever it discovered commission of a wrongful act or omission by any of the governing organs. Courts of law were created to serve the cause of justice, truth, and equality for the people of this great ancient civilization. If a citizen complained of denial of justice of his/her right(s) guaranteed under the Constitution, it was seen that more injury and anguish was caused to the complainant by utter indifference and inaction on Your part than the original injury complained of by the victim. It is not being suggested that You have acted on the basis of any personal deficiency or bias or interest, but what is seen by an uninvolved person is that the judiciary members have been mostly passive or inactive in taking strict legal action against the wrongdoer on account of sheer disinterest, indifference and a tendency to keep the matter alive on the shelves of the record room of the court...for no personal gain...yet contrary to the principles of law, ethics and moral obligations. This creation of backlog of pending cases is wholly avoidable, and it does no good for any person. Rather, it does a disservice to 'We, the People' and the Nation in its growth...
But, first, let us meet the truest Hero - the Common Man/Woman who make together - 'We, the People'.
I found a perfect description of the Common Man/Woman in the expression of Shri Amitabh Bachchan (credit India Today): "It is the common man of our Nation, indeed of any Nation, that will and shall remain the truest hero. It is he that endures the rigours of life, set about by those that he through mandate appoints as managers of a nation. He places them with responsibility, for decision making, for protection, for guiding us and exploring ways and means of how they could better the life for him.
And, it is he who despite all this still remains a common man - unknown, invisible, undecorated, unrewarded and the bearer of the worst outcomes of another's deeds. It is he who bears the horror of separation when asked to leave his home and land, when countries face division and partition. It is he who is placed precariously on the 'fronts' then to defend any intrusions that may occur as a result of this. It is he, who unable to afford sufficient medical treatment, perishes during a plague or mass disease and epidemic. It is he who struggles to bear the 'costs' of a price rise in daily and essential consumables. It is he who becomes the largest victim of the terror attack. And yet it is he who will be first to be asked to endorse the course of action that a nation has chosen, and who will voluntarily and willingly do so" ... though, quite unknowing that he himself will be the first victim of that endorsement.
So, are You, the members of Judiciary, not aware of this gross injustice? Don't You have the power to act suo-motu to stop this wholly avoidable misery? Then, why maintain stoic silence? Why do You choose to fail him, Yourself and finally, the Nation?
1. That with due respect to You, the Hon'ble Judges, it would not be wrong to say that as per the scheme of the Constitution of India, the judiciary was given the power and duty to check and undo whenever it discovered commission of a wrongful act or omission by any of the governing organs. Courts of law were created to serve the cause of justice, truth, and equality for the people of this great ancient civilization. If a citizen complained of denial of justice of his/her right(s) guaranteed under the Constitution, it was seen that more injury and anguish was caused to the complainant by utter indifference and inaction on Your part than the original injury complained of by the victim. It is not being suggested that You have acted on the basis of any personal deficiency or bias or interest, but what is seen by an uninvolved person is that the judiciary members have been mostly passive or inactive in taking strict legal action against the wrongdoer on account of sheer disinterest, indifference and a tendency to keep the matter alive on the shelves of the record room of the court...for no personal gain...yet contrary to the principles of law, ethics and moral obligations. This creation of backlog of pending cases is wholly avoidable, and it does no good for any person. Rather, it does a disservice to 'We, the People' and the Nation in its growth...
But, first, let us meet the truest Hero - the Common Man/Woman who make together - 'We, the People'.
I found a perfect description of the Common Man/Woman in the expression of Shri Amitabh Bachchan (credit India Today): "It is the common man of our Nation, indeed of any Nation, that will and shall remain the truest hero. It is he that endures the rigours of life, set about by those that he through mandate appoints as managers of a nation. He places them with responsibility, for decision making, for protection, for guiding us and exploring ways and means of how they could better the life for him.
And, it is he who despite all this still remains a common man - unknown, invisible, undecorated, unrewarded and the bearer of the worst outcomes of another's deeds. It is he who bears the horror of separation when asked to leave his home and land, when countries face division and partition. It is he who is placed precariously on the 'fronts' then to defend any intrusions that may occur as a result of this. It is he, who unable to afford sufficient medical treatment, perishes during a plague or mass disease and epidemic. It is he who struggles to bear the 'costs' of a price rise in daily and essential consumables. It is he who becomes the largest victim of the terror attack. And yet it is he who will be first to be asked to endorse the course of action that a nation has chosen, and who will voluntarily and willingly do so" ... though, quite unknowing that he himself will be the first victim of that endorsement.
So, are You, the members of Judiciary, not aware of this gross injustice? Don't You have the power to act suo-motu to stop this wholly avoidable misery? Then, why maintain stoic silence? Why do You choose to fail him, Yourself and finally, the Nation?
